User blog comment:Teamedward4eva/Stephenie Meyer vs. J.K. Rowling/@comment-101.179.28.7-20150530030645

I have to say that I've read the Twilight books and I never found anything that made them interesting. Harry Potter had it's own unique magic about it. In Harry Potter, all the females mentioned have a strong personality and are independant with their own sterngths and their not just there for romance or t create interest. In Twilight, Bella is basically just there to cerate some romance and to act as the typical damsel in distress. And have you even read the quotes in Harry Potter? Theres creativity in there and you'd think that some sort of Writing God came down to Earth and made them. Normal human can't make quotes like that. The one easiest way to know a good book is by how long it's been loved for. The Twilight books are like some book that was shown some craze for a few days but then just blew out. Harry Potter has been close to so many peoples hearts for so long. And J.K Rowling adds some mystery and a personal touch to the book. The  more you read it the more you understand. The first time I read it was when I was 9 and I just couldn't put the book down. Under ten is a tender age when it comes to reading books and I didn't et the full concept at parts but later when I read it again, I understood more and the next time I understood more. Thats whats magical about J.K Rowlings writing, it doesn't go out of style, the more you read it the more you get it, the more you get it the more you like it. It never gets boring since you understand more everytime you read it. Hope this makes you understand. :)