User blog comment:Teamedward4eva/Stephenie Meyer vs. J.K. Rowling/@comment-2072316-20110714203300

In the writing department, I consider J. K. Rowling to be the better author. Once reread, the Twilight Saga seems like a book for 12 year olds. The unnecessary commas, the writing style and whatever else makes me think Stephenie Meyer did not put as much thought into Twilight(because I studied the reasoningwithvampires.tumblr blog) as Rowling put into Harry Potter. And if you read the Harry Potter series, which is much larger that Twilight, then how can you say it sucked? In a totally non-defensive way, I must say, if you don't like a book from the beginning, how can you keep reading it and the following ones, especially when Harry Potter is a large read. I think that, when you read something like the Twilight Saga, you skip all the mistakes and things that don't make sense sometimes and focus on Bella jumping off cliffs. Meyer is not a terrible author, otherwise the series wouldn't be so popular; but she isn't great, either. And what is with this constant bickering? "Twilight vs Harry Potter". They don't have anything to do with eachother. And it's the same with saying "Stephenie Meyer vs J. K. Rowling", as I see it. I like Twilight because it's been a while now. But if I'd find out about it now, I probably wouldn't like it even half as much.