User blog comment:Teamedward4eva/Stephenie Meyer vs. J.K. Rowling/@comment-216.195.178.159-20110923053030

As nice as it is to read a post where you say in six sentences (three of which had nothing to do with the post) how you think Harry Potter sucks. You have no reasoning for why you believe Twilight is better. You don't mention the description the authors used, the time spent writing the books, the complexity of the characters, the emotion evoked while reading, the overall message of the books, the number of fans for the books, the plot of the books, or how believable the books were. So tell me, what is your reasoning?

I have read both series, seen all the movies and admittedly enjoyed each. However, I do have valid reasons as to which is superior. How many times do fans for each series reread the books? One series clearly stands out as superior.

Also, I want you to know that I am insulting you because I am annoyed by ignorance and when people state their views with no reasoning behind them. (You do know that you don't need a period if you have an exclamation mark, right?). I really would enjoy hearing what your reasoning is beyond, 'IT SUCKED!!' and, 'Harry Potter is just that good' (by which, I'm sure you actually meant to say not that good). Please do try and type a literate response.

Also, I was led to this by searching for sharp-witted book characters. So there is no need to go on about me having no right to post a comment on this twilight site.