Talk:Emily Young/@comment-3518524-20140908021529/@comment-24927180-20140914152002

Sam couldn't have shifted in 2003. Because how could he shift in his senior year in 2003 when he wasn't in his senior year until 2005. If Leah was still a senior in New Moon which she was! Bella told us this! Then Sam had to still be a senior as well! He shfited in 2005, during Twilight, and dropped out of school. Sam and Leah are the same age, so he couldn't shift have shifted until during Twilight to fit there where he should be.

Leah was still a senior in New Moon.

So, Sam was still a senior in New Moon, or he had been.

Yes, this is confusing because you are correct the guide says differently, but this is not the first thing that Meyer has messed up in the scheme of a timeline.

People still fighting about Renesmee's birthday being the 10th or the 11th when it has to be the 11th.

I'm not saying your wrong about what the guide says, I'm not saying you're wrong at allbut because of the timeline from the actual book, it makes that information wrong.

This is just something that Meyer didn't follow her own timeline.

Which happens multiple times in this book and in the guide with the timeline, and information.

It's why the book says Seth is fifteen, but the guide would tell us that Seth is fourteen.

Do you understand what I'm trying to say?

We are actually both correct, but I'm looking at the book timeline while you are looking at the guide, and the two don't match up from what we've been told about Sam and Leah.

Which Sam and Leah were in the same year, so they were both seniors in New Moon, and Sam didn't shift until his senior year.

Do you see what I'm saying this is confusing?

It's a very backwards timeline.