Talk:Shape-shifters vs. vampires/@comment-3002818-20101227021502/@comment-87.112.116.202-20110521162949

No, I think that vampires can trump a Werewolf in any situation... who says that werewolves are faster than vampires? Aside from in New Moon (they were just being cocky because they're enemies). Also, Vampires are about the equivalent strength to werewolves, but make up for that with agility and stamina - which, of course, werewolves can't maintain since they use aerobic/anaerobic respiration to fight (vampires both can't do this - no heartbeat - and won't, their strength is simply there). Yes, a werewolf may tear a vampire to pieces - but only if it gets past it's original defences I've mentioned above. Also, vampires can put themselves back together if not burnt... I don't think werewolves can do that (granted, they heal fast, but, if a limb is ripped off, they only have a certain amount of given time before the hole left heals over). And also, the leader of the Cullen clan doesn't strongly resemble the face a llama. Point proved? I think so.